You are currently not signed in.

Please sign in or register.

المنتدى Suggestion Box Adding FxStat to Wikipedia
Votes: +3
Status: Completed

Adding FxStat to Wikipedia

صفحة: 1 2 >
Jul 14, 2011 05:17 pm
#1
Richde User

مشاركات: 114
اشترك في: 11/01/2011

I believe adding FxStat to Wikipedia would be a good idea. Although its a bit hardy idea, but it would definately worth a shot. Some references and a neutral point of view should be important.

Let's see some examples:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FxPro

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oanda_Corporation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EToro

Maybe FxStat is not big enough yet to be posted on Wikipedia, but if its succeed its surely gets a better reputation.

Keep it simple stupid

Aug 25, 2011 10:21 am
fxstat Admin

مشاركات: 447
اشترك في: 30/03/2010

Hi,

We have created FxStat Wikipedia page 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FxStat

[blush]

FxStat, Power to traders www.FxStat.com

Aug 25, 2011 08:23 pm
illiterate User

مشاركات: 561
اشترك في: 21/04/2011

Why it says "deleted"?

https://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=medium&c=1&s=25892&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=monthly&o4=equity

Aug 26, 2011 04:01 am
widhie75 User

مشاركات: 118
اشترك في: 05/12/2010

is it illegal by rule?

A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content).

 

if it about A7 rule (web content), why we can still read 'Facebook' article in Wikipedia?

http://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=wide&c=3&s=8617&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=profitfactor

Sep 19, 2011 08:35 am
megrawab Hostedslavebeta

مشاركات: 331
اشترك في: 16/08/2011

ooh... there are multiple reasons why it has been deleted. Another reason is that it appears to be promoting the site.

 

I think Fxstat should create another one because wikipedia is a big source of information about everything and it appears really high on search engine rankings.

I am a hosted slave beta.

Sep 20, 2011 06:11 pm
Champ User

مشاركات: 711
اشترك في: 17/05/2011

Originally posted by Richde

I believe adding FxStat to Wikipedia would be a good idea. Although its a bit hardy idea, but it would definately worth a shot. Some references and a neutral point of view should be important.

Let's see some examples:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FxPro

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oanda_Corporation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EToro

Maybe FxStat is not big enough yet to be posted on Wikipedia, but if its succeed its surely gets a better reputation.



The above links provided have page on wikipedia and these are not deleted. But it is written that they are not compatible with wikipedia standards and people should help in changing the page.

I am still confused why those pages are not deleted? Is it bcoz they were advertised but to some extent and maybe a little improvement in them can make them compatible? or maybe bcoz they are very old websites and very well known?

http://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=tiny&c=1&s=24959&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=profitfactor

Sep 22, 2011 10:11 am
megrawab Hostedslavebeta

مشاركات: 331
اشترك في: 16/08/2011

I think even if a company is big or small, wikipedia still accepts it as long as it is informative. And I think wikipedia would be glad to increase their database with information on lots of things. I wonder why FXstat is still in Beta since I've seen posts on forums that are posted on 2010. What I notice about Beta stage is that they will become not beta in few times. With the current status of FXstat, does beta means under testing and development?

I am a hosted slave beta.

Sep 24, 2011 12:25 pm
ironical User

مشاركات: 734
اشترك في: 22/04/2011

Originally posted by megrawab

I think even if a company is big or small, wikipedia still accepts it as long as it is informative. And I think wikipedia would be glad to increase their database with information on lots of things. I wonder why FXstat is still in Beta since I've seen posts on forums that are posted on 2010. What I notice about Beta stage is that they will become not beta in few times. With the current status of FXstat, does beta means under testing and development?



But beta stage cannot be a problem to make page on wikipedia. The reason of deletion is actually advertisement and promotional content. Moreover fxstat is on beta coz there are still updates coming to improve the website as u can see some "In work" suggestions. Similarly there might be some more updates for it.

Maybe fxstat team can give another try to make page on wikipedia.

The good or ill of a man lies within his own will. – Epictetus

Sep 25, 2011 10:28 am
megrawab Hostedslavebeta

مشاركات: 331
اشترك في: 16/08/2011

Originally posted by ironical
But beta stage cannot be a problem to make page on wikipedia. The reason of deletion is actually advertisement and promotional content. Moreover fxstat is on beta coz there are still updates coming to improve the website as u can see some "In work" suggestions. Similarly there might be some more updates for it. Maybe fxstat team can give another try to make page on wikipedia.


  okay maybe you're right... but I'm not telling that fxstat's wikipedia page is deleted because it is still in beta. I'm just trying to relate that FXstat is not that very big yet  with it's being in beta stage. [grin]

I am a hosted slave beta.

Oct 13, 2011 04:09 am
Sasha User

مشاركات: 836
اشترك في: 16/05/2011

I hope it will be done soon.

Oct 16, 2011 05:05 pm
ironical User

مشاركات: 734
اشترك في: 22/04/2011

I searched over google about wikipage of fxstat. I found one. The current page is still not removed. wikipedia has asked independent users to review the page. I think this time the page looks more informational and helpful.

The good or ill of a man lies within his own will. – Epictetus

صفحة: 1 2 >